About Me

Name: Patriot One
Location: Dutton, VA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

CBS Outdoor- One More Arm Of The Obama Machine

I'd never heard of GOD TV but today I received an email that Newt was going to be featured in a  live event joined by Huckabee and others in a talk centered around rediscovering God in America and how important faith in the public square is in todays world. Unfortunately I read the email to late to hear this talk but got the chance to hear another speaker whose talk centered around government/freedom/God and the constitution. Bottom line more government more poverty/less freedom--less government more wealth and freedom.
Now you may ask how this ties into my title for this post. Below I am going to outline my latest rant around one more attempt to reduce our freedoms, my thoughts about it and follow up comments.

I find the decision by CBS OUTDOOR to deny ad space for the [wheres the birth certificate] ad appalling at best. Especially in light of the fact that you allow truly offensive ads on your billboards promoting violence, sex, and many types of alternative lifestyle campaign ads that millions of people in this country abhor.

Those four words ask a simple question, easily answered. Recent polling suggests that over 70% of the people in this country are concerned about this issue.

Even though never mentioned by name it is obvious to every one that President Obama, who  promised in campaign rhetoric, to be the most honest and transparent administration ever seated is creating one of the most opaque administrations in history when it concerns him personally.

When main stream media and subsidiaries like yours stifle honest questions like this from even seeing the light of day it just goes to the point that many hold in this country that you are a defacto arm of the Obama Machine and in fact prove to many that this IS the year that Journalism died in this country.

One last thing: to stonewall and refuse to explain how a company that is trying to purchase your service has violated your terms of service beyond the statement that they are violating those terms: IE from WND article

 ["Asked why the company considers birth certificate billboards "misleading, offensive, or otherwise incompatible with individual community standards," Kalinowski replied, "I'm not going to go any further than the statement. That's where the industry stands. As the statement says, we strongly support all of our companies' rights to reject copy for any reason."Upon further inquiry, he replied, "I am not going to give you anything more than what's in our statement."]

shows such a total lack of courage to back up your position that it tells me that you cannot support your own statement with any proof that the ad in fact, vioaltes your policies.

When your own local account representative had no problem with the ad and was directed by higher authority to refuse accepting the ad it lets anyone with a brain realize that there is certainly some type of agenda in play-politics or otherwise.

My hope is that this action of yours, receives so much attention, that businesses across the nation look for alternative billboard space for their ads and affect your miserable bottom line even more.
--

The Best D**N Training In The Industry.
Learn How To Create Your Own Leads And
Generate Instant Cash In Any Company.
http://mortgageprova.magneticsponsoringonline.com


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is The Great Experiment Really On The Way Out?

An oath (from Anglo-Saxon að, also called plight) is either a promise or a statement of fact calling upon something or someone that the oath maker considers sacred, usually God, as a witness to the binding nature of the promise or the truth of the statement of fact. To swear is to take an oath.

Article 2 of the the United States Constitution prescribes that the President must take the oath "before he enter on the Execution of his Office".

The oath of office of the President of the United States is an oath or affirmation required by the United States Constitution before the President begins the execution of the office.

38 words and a bible by convention (or another book) to anknowledge that the oath maker is calling upon a higher authority to bear witness to the bingding nature of his promise.

As one popular jingle goes "so easy a cave man could do it".

Not so in the case of our bigger than life new president-(at least for the present) until his status of even being a legitimate holder of the office is ferreted out.

In his excitement to hurry up and get his swearing in over so that he could get access to executive power, he cut off the officiating official in mid sentence causing him to mis speak the required order of words necessary to take on the mantle of power. Strike one.

The oath was again presented incorrectly missing one of the words. Strike two.

The oath was repeated in the original incorrect sequence. Strike three. But left there to get on with the circus.

After review by constitutional scholars the decision was made that the oath requirements neccessary to gain access to legitimate executive power had not been fulfilled properly and in an excess of caution would be readministered in private.

This time the words were recited and repeated correctly in the proper sequence BUT THE BIBLE WAS LEFT OUT. Strike four.

The requirement is that the oath must be sworn to with a book in hand that bears evidence that the oath is being sworn to by a higher power, that the oath taker acknowledges as having that power, in order to provide evidence of the binding power of his oath. By convention in America, it is the Bible. Not so for Obama. When questioned, his response was it wasn't necessary, He was just doing the redo as a matter of form.

The question is: if the original swearing in ceremony was conflicted enough to be considered invalid and requiring it to be done again correctly, anything sworn to in that event became null and void, so in the repeat of the oath who or what exactly was Obama putting in play as required as the binding authority.

Once again he didn't get it right and some are saying he needs to do it over and this time do it right--his response not necessary. Constitution? Whats that got to do with it?

I guess maybe his followers have it right--he is the messiah and therefor doesn't need to make an oath to a higher power- THE ONE is enough.

Just one more item to add to the list of the things that do not matter:
No records
No birth certificate
No Constitution
No God

I weep

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »